Did a specific cause create the effect? In the case of an injury, figuring out what caused a certain effect (an injury) isn’t particularly straightforward. Amiss pointed blame, legal entangling, and formal definitions, accident lawyers in Tucson explore the dynamics of a single cause to create the effect: an injury.
The ultimate goal of a personal injury attorney is to find the cause of the incident, and that can be deceptively hard to do. Most of the time, the cause and the effect is outlined by one term: reason. The basic ethos of the argument is as follows: did a person reasonably cause the accident to occur?
It is not enough to have someone slip and fall in a commercial property and have the owner be responsible. This is because the employer may have been responsible to make the area safe. Take the classic example of a wet floor sign. The basis of the argument says that if a wet floor sign is present, then responsibility is on the visitor or customer. If it is not, then the property or business owner is liable for an incident. The owner was not reasonable in their actions. In this case, they made a blatant mistake.
Now, what if the sign was present? Does it automatically constitute no lawsuit with accident lawyers in Tucson? The answer is no. The sign may be up, but perhaps the floor was mopped right in the front lobby. Say, even further, it was mopped while people were standing around and during the busiest hour of the day? What if, at worst, it was done while a man with a cane was present in the lobby?
This is the exact opposite of reason. Sure, the sign was up, but no reasonable action was taken to be safe and responsible. Another scenario of reason may be outside of a wet floor, such as a heavy piece of equipment in a main traffic area.
Visit us website for an explanation of what a reasonable action means. There may or may not be a case here, but the reality is that reasonable action must have taken place somewhere.